A September 2008:

United States and world wade into the Second Great Depression which affects the entire global community, depressing economic conditions in US, Russia, Europe, and Asian communities.

Georgia presumably could become associated as a NATO state, involving Europe in the potential conflict on the Western side. A Polish missile arrange[r]ment also links Europe to the Western side.

The Russian pledge to consider an attack on Iran an attack on Russia continues to be a substantial military potential as Russia enhances its military positioning in Middle Eastern regions.

American executive plans to invade Iran continue despite elections approaching and a 3% approval rating of war with Iran. Additional fifth and sixth carrier groups sail for the Strait of Hormuz.

Iranian advances in nuclear technology and preparations either in their industry or US media presentations are publicized to the world by international media sources. No sound intelligence yet links Iran to nuclear weaponization.

The Beijing Olympics end and China restores its oppressive regime. An economic slowdown rapidly leaves China economically struggling and loaded with devaluing currencies. Chinese economic leverage falls through despite stockpiles.

In the days before the November elections, rhetoric dramatically intensifies from the Oval Office regarding Iranian activities in relation to Israel. False flag attacks rock Tel Aviv and George Bush declares 24 hours before an Iranian invasion. Special attacks begin immediately. Or American navies seal the Strait of Hormuz to Iranian shipping, blocking off oil deliveries to critical areas of the world. Russian activities in Georgia prevent the Caspian oil pipeline from flowing.

On the back of the global economic crisis and fuel blockades oil prices in America rise to $7 a barrel on election day. American people are forced to decide intentional war with John McCain or unintentional war with George Bush inherited to Barack Obama. They ultimately choose the latter, which the politicians allow them to in order to seal American public culpability through the executive. [#5 method shows a way out of this]

To avoid this war, technology could be released and disclosure made by world governments about alien interactivity, genetic fitness, spiritual culmination, energy technologies and sciences. It has been unattractive to approach these topics in modern political and scientific society. Consider a metric of whether or not this information could be dispensed from the world's states and the public believe it and continue to maintain these governments for 6 months to 1 year successfully. It is my position that this goal is achievable and preferable to the then pointless Iranian engagement.

Maps

Map of Iran:


Outside Information About Iran:


Map of Iran:


Large Geographical Map of Iran:


Small Geographical Map of Asia:


Large Political Map of Russian States:


Pre-Conflict

The start of active tensions could be a Western embargo of shipping and fuels. Iran is an importer of food but can get supplies from a closer alliance with Russia. Nearby China is also a food importer and would be devastated by an economic collapse with agricultural repercussions. A military conflict with Iran and Russia is not necessarily in the main interests of the Western Powers. Eventually a direct military conflict has been threatened to come into play. Weakening an enemy through economic measures will be insufficient to achieve victory.

Remember that this wargame is intentioned to prevent war by laying everything on the table between humanity. Readiness is an excellent way to remain ready and at home.

It is less probable that ex-Soviet satellite states and Eastern European NATO nations Belarus, Ukraine, Kazakhstan, would follow through with an first strike attack on Russia and Iran in support of America, Britain, and Israel with enthusiasm. We must prepare for a possible flash re-Sovietization. Weighted values for Eastern European nations could be as empty space. Caspian nations such as Georgia, Chechnya, and environs may be useful.

Western European NATO nations are also less probable to support aggressive military action but would respond quickly to aggression. Successful media and government campaigns or false terrorism may be useful to "NN" capitols. This is war crime and is punishable by hanging. Fomenting an aggressive war against Iran and Russia from the West is very unpopular and the decision and orders may collapse at numerous points. Alternatives such as those described above should be strongly sought and war of this nature prevented.

A question should be asked: would Russia perform this kind of a military engagement in 2008? What risks are there here? Fuel and eugenics. We can work more intensely to discover and publish secrets of DNA and life and alternative technology use and achieve more of our goals.

Recall as well that the Jester Bulgar effect likely comes from this region and one certain axis is northwest towards Germany through the Chech and Slovak nations and southeast.

Military Conflict

The most aggressive military conflict would necessitate an immediate invasion by American, British, Israeli, and NATO forces of Iran and Russia.

This would certainly be accomplished first by using nuclear weapons. American, British, and Israeli nuclear submarines and silos would launch on all Russian and Iranian targets immediately in November 2008, followed likely by French NATO missiles. Roughly 1200 missiles in the early game would be sent to Russian and Iranian cities, reaching their targets in a matter of hours. This would open the global theater to a number of instabilities. All Western cities would face immediate evacuation and bomb shelter readiness and radiation procedures.

American teams would break the 1978 treaties with the Soviet Union barring earthquake attacks to prevent or disrupt major Russian silo-based nuclear missile launches. The effectivity of this could be moderate, knocking out some launch sites American attacks on the Russian electrical arrays could precede anti-nuclear earthquake strikes. A tsunami could be created on Russia's Pacific coastline to distract their population's attention and state response in the coming days. November would preclude an artic sea strike of a similar nature and a Baltic tsunami strike against St Petersburg would be unthinkable in terms of Finnish and Estonian coastlines, but technical teams could determine feasibility of such a strike in addition to nuclear and conventional assault. Russian and Iranian naval presence is presumed to be small enough that environmental attacks are unattractive and secondary damages from tsunamis make them less probable weapons.

Several Western nuclear EMP strikes over Russian atmosphere could disable some of their electrical and military installations and communications early in the attack. Similar strikes could be used against recognized Russian airborne targets.

Attacks against Russian satellite communications systems could also be achieved with land-based Western missiles or lasers.

The West would launch B2's and other bombers from bases in Europe, Israel, and the Gulf to attack Iranian and Russian national targets and submarines. Substantial land based military hardware in Europe and Eastern Europe would launch at and watch for Russian air and missile targets and begin rolling towards Russia.

Western navies would block the Strait of Hormuz, Suez Canal, and Indonesian Passage and search globally and in probable regions for Russian nuclear submarines.

Commando teams inside Russia and Iran would detonate planted explosives at key decapitation and hardware sites.

Western hackers would infiltrate Russian and Iranian networks seeking to disable or mislaunch missiles and send erroneous and misleading commands to military targets and shut down secured communications networks and empty state bank accounts of currencies.

Probable Iranian and Russian Response to a Western First Strike:

Russian and Iranian anti-missile response would be extremely heavy and an immediate counterlaunch would approach from Russian nuclear weapons facilities and submarines on European, Israeli, and American targets numbering in the thousands of nuclear missiles launched.

Russian anti-missile webworks may be advanced and successfully defend up to 100% of Russian and Iranian targets even with thousands of missiles seeking only scores of targets. Advanced laser capabilities and energy field equipment may liquefy or detonate missiles passing through the ionosphere or other layers of earth's atmosphere.

It is probable that our Patriot missile systems will be unsuccessful and that HAARP installations will be continually busy. Advanced Russian missiles evade numerous countermeasures and are resistant to lasers. This will make them very difficult to destroy and we may face numerous nuclear strikes on American, Israeli, and European cities, barring Angry Flower interventions.

We cannot count on a single successful nuclear detonation, although atmospheric detonations are likely to trigger EMP effects on any unprotected Russian networks regardless of their targets.

Russians would likely use their earthquake machines to attack Western installations and silos. They could create massive Atlantic and Pacific tsunamis that would strike the European and American coastlines. This would be a devastating attack and cripple American and European military longevity in the conflict. A similar Russian strike against American forces in the Strait of Hormuz would be extremely damaging to our naval and air force resources. Technical abilities to prevent or turn back these attacks should become high priorities. Would a nuclear strike morally justify this condition?

Depending on their military posture and global conditions Russia could launch aggressive land and air wars into Europe and the Middle East. Probable targets are the American fleet in the Strait of Hormuz,